Digital Photography Blog: Digital Camera Reviews, Ratings, News, Tips and Tutorials.
February 2010
February 2009
January 2009
August 2008
July 2008
April 2008
March 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
Digital Camera Reviews and Ratings By manufacturer:
Canon | Casio | Fuji | HP | Kodak | Minolta | Nikon | Olympus | Panasonic | Pentax | Samsung | Sony | Misc. | Accessories | Lenses
The series of articles titled 'Is Photography Art?' is well worth the read. In a three part series it takes an interesting walk though history looking at the question named in the title.
'Over the past 160 years of photography, one theme that has emerged at regular intervals is the question 'Is photography Art?' In the first few years, perhaps the inventors and pioneers were too busy taking pictures to worry much about the question. After all, most of them were artists. For many it was a matter of simply putting down the brush and taking up camera. Few may really have believed that 'From today, painting is dead', but photography was something new and exciting that had caught the imagination of public and artists alike. It could also possibly be a way to make a living.'
- Art and Photography - Part 1: Is Photography Art?
- Art and Photography - Part 2: Charles Sheeler and Rouge
- Art and Photography - Part 3: Paul Nash
Posted by Darren in our News category on April 04, 2004