Digital Photography Blog: Digital Camera Reviews, Ratings, News, Tips and Tutorials.
February 2010
February 2009
January 2009
August 2008
July 2008
April 2008
March 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
Digital Camera Reviews and Ratings By manufacturer:
Canon | Casio | Fuji | HP | Kodak | Minolta | Nikon | Olympus | Panasonic | Pentax | Samsung | Sony | Misc. | Accessories | Lenses
Good discussion over at Photo.net on the topic of Fullframe vs. APS-C sensors. EOS 5D vs. EOS20D. It's a topic I'm often asked about so I think I'll be handing over this link in future:
'You might think that it would be pretty easy to compare imags from a EOS 5D (full frame) with a EOS 20D (APS-C), but it's actually more difficult than you might think. You need to compare apples to apples, not apples to oranges and that's not quite so easy as it sounds. There are perhaps four different ways that you could use to compare image quality
1 - The first way is that you could use a different lens on each camera, each giving the same field of view. For example a 35/2.0 lens on the EOS 20D and an 50/1.8 lens on the EOS 5D would give you almost the same image in each case. However you'd then be testing the image quality of the two lenses as much as the image quality of the two sensors....'
Posted by Darren in our News category on February 08, 2006