August 2008
July 2008
April 2008
March 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
Digital Camera Reviews and Ratings By manufacturer:
Canon | Casio | Fuji | HP | Kodak | Minolta | Nikon | Olympus | Panasonic | Pentax | Samsung | Sony | Misc. | Accessories | Lenses
The following Mini Review of the Canon 50mm f/1.8 Lens was submitted by Liza 11.
This is the lens that every new DSLR user should have in their bag. Inexpensive but with good image quality, the “nifty fifty” is a crowd pleaser. It’s a good lens for the beginner, as I feel it makes you consider composition more carefully since you’re required to foot zoom instead of resorting to the convenience of a zoom lens. For the price, the 50mm f/1.8 is an outstanding value and delivers the goods. When I started shooting film seriously in 1986, this was my “kit lens,” which I continued to use on my SLR for many years. And when I upgraded to an EOS camera, it was the first EF mount lens I purchased.
Canon 50mm f/1.8 II Pros:
Canon 50mm f/1.8 II Cons:
Compare Prices on the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Lens and get the latest price on the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Camera Lens
Posted by Darren in our Lenses category on August 10, 2006
You have the f/1.4 don't you Darren? Have you ever compared the two? I very nearly put up the additional money to get the f/1.4 but then decided the little plastic beast was such a bargain I would make do with the f/1.8. I have only heard conflicting reports about the two ever since, mostly people defending the one they own rather than any objective comparison.
I do have the 1.4 and it's definately faster - the only problem is that with the speed comes increased challenges of depth of field - something I'm still working on mastering at the 1.4 end of things :-)