30 September, 2004 10:18 AM
You will no doubt have heard of the Vioxx Recall in the news in previous weeks. Below are a list of helpful resources related to the recall and some information to help you wade through the Vioxx Recall news.
Despite VIOXX’s treatment of a wide range of pain-inducing health problems, the list of potential side effects in substantially longer. While the occurrence of each side effect no doubt varies from person to person, the extensiveness of the list, combined with recent corroborating evidence, is quite telling: VIOXX can be very dangerous.
Side effects for VIOXX include, but are not limited to, the following:
- Serious stomach problems, such as stomach and intestinal bleeding
- Serious allergic reactions, including the symptoms and signs of swelling of the face, lips and tongue
- Trouble breathing
- Heart attacks and other serious cardiovascular events, such as blood clots
- Serious kidney problems, including acute kidney failure and worsening of chronic kidney failure
- Severe liver problems, including hepatitis, jaundice and liver failure
The following side effects of Vioxx are less severe, but occur more frequently:
- Respiratory infections
- Nausea, vomiting and upset stomach
- Stomach pain
- Swelling of the legs and/or feet
- High blood pressure
- Back pain
- Urinary tract infection.
Get more information on the Vioxx Recall at:
- FDA Vioxx (rofecoxib) Questions and Answers - information about the Vioxx Recall from the US Food and Drug Administration.
- FDA News - FDA Issues Public Health Advisory on Vioxx as its Manufacturer Voluntarily Withdraws the Product - Press Release from the FDA. 'In June 2000, Merck submitted to FDA a safety study called VIGOR (Vioxx Gastrointestinal Outcomes Research) that found an increased risk of serious cardiovascular events, including heart attacks and strokes, in patients taking Vioxx compared to patients taking naproxen. After reviewing the results of the VIGOR study and other available data from controlled clinical trials, FDA consulted with its Arthritis Advisory Committee in February 2001 regarding the clinical interpretation of this new safety information. In April 2002, FDA implemented labeling changes to reflect the findings from the VIGOR study. The labeling changes included information about the increase in risk of cardiovascular events, including heart attack and stroke.'
- Vioxx Linked to Heart Attack and Stroke - 'Following a three-year study involving the drug, it was concluded that withdrawing Vioxx from the market would be in the best interest of the patients. The drug, a popular pain reliever used worldwide by millions of patients, has also been connected with higher incidences of respiratory and liver and kidney dysfunction.'
- Vioxx Recall May Bring Flood of Suits to Merck - 'Last week's decision by Merck to halt sales of Vioxx, its blockbuster painkiller, could lead to an onslaught of new lawsuits against the company.
Hundreds and perhaps thousands of new Vioxx lawsuits are likely to be filed, lawyers said, with many of them class actions that aim to represent large groups of Vioxx users who have taken the drug for extended periods. Indeed, radio advertisements seeking plaintiffs are being broadcast and some suits were filed almost immediately after Merck's recall announcement on Thursday.
"Our lawsuit was in the works but the filing was accelerated by the recall," said Don S. Strong, a lawyer who filed a suit against Merck on Thursday in the United States District Court in Oklahoma City.'
- Vioxx Recall - Merck's Arthritis Drug Pulled From The Market - 'Vioxx (rofecoxib) was launched in 1999 and has become a blockbuster hit for manufacturer Merck & Co. After recent safety concern flattened its sales to a still highly profitable $2.55 billion in 2003 alone, Merck has announced it is issuing a voluntary withdrawal of Vioxx. Clinical trial data has shown Vioxx increased the risk of blood clots linked to strokes and heart attacks, and after Merck's data safety monitoring board overseeing a long-term Vioxx study confirmed the increased risk of serious cardiovascular events, they recommended the study be halted and a recall be issued.'
- Vioxx Recall - 'The news that the popular arthritis drug Vioxx is being pulled from store shelves by its manufacturer has surprised many people who have found it helpful for arthritis for years.
Health Team reporter Christine Webb spoke with doctors who said--don't worry -- there are alternatives.
Dr. Doug Jones is a clinical immunologist at Rochester General Hospital who often prescribes Vioxx.
On Thursday, he took boxes Vioxx off the shelf and instead will prescribe Bextra or Celebrex for his patients. These medications are also used to treat the pain and inflammation of osteoarthritis and adult rheumatoid arthritis and are safe to use.'
- Vioxx Recall May Cost Merck $2 Billion - 'Merrill Lynch maintained a "neutral" rating and $33 target price on Merck but lowered its earnings estimates on the pharmaceutical company, saying the Vioxx recall could result in a reduction of ongoing pretax income of about $2 billion. The research firm cut its 2004 and 2005 earnings estimates to $2.54 and $2.67, from $3.14 and $3.34, respectively.'
- Vioxx Recall Leads to Worldwide Spam Reduction - 'Pharmaceutical giant Merck's surprise withdrawal yesterday of its anti-arthritis drug Vioxx (also known as rofecoxib) caught more than just Wall Street by surprise. Although most media attention was focused on arthritis sufferers and other patients who were taking Vioxx for general pain relief, spammers — who prefer to call themselves "bulk email providers" — were dealing with their own anxiety issues.
"Vioxx is an important drug for us", says acknowledged spam king Pone Leray. "There are literally millions of people out there with arthritis and similar conditions who have been able to find relief using Vioxx. Now we can't market it to them anymore. We've had to temporarily suspend many of our mailings while we figure out how to best deal with the problem."'
Merck Announces Voluntary Worldwide Withdrawal of VIOXX®
WHITEHOUSE STATION, N.J., Sept. 30, 2004 - Merck &. Co., Inc. today announced a voluntary worldwide withdrawal of VIOXX® (rofecoxib), its arthritis and acute pain medication. The company's decision, which is effective immediately, is based on new, three-year data from a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, the APPROVe (Adenomatous Polyp Prevention on VIOXX) trial.
The trial, which is being stopped, was designed to evaluate the efficacy of VIOXX 25 mg in preventing recurrence of colorectal polyps in patients with a history of colorectal adenomas. In this study, there was an increased relative risk for confirmed cardiovascular events, such as heart attack and stroke, beginning after 18 months of treatment in the patients taking VIOXX compared to those taking placebo. The results for the first 18 months of the APPROVe study did not show any increased risk of confirmed cardiovascular events on VIOXX, and in this respect, are similar to the results of two placebo-controlled studies described in the current U.S. labeling for VIOXX.
"We are taking this action because we believe it best serves the interests of patients," said Raymond V. Gilmartin, chairman, president and chief executive officer of Merck. "Although we believe it would have been possible to continue to market VIOXX with labeling that would incorporate these new data, given the availability of alternative therapies, and the questions raised by the data, we concluded that a voluntary withdrawal is the responsible course to take."
APPROVe was a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to determine the effect of 156 weeks (three years) of treatment with VIOXX on the recurrence of neoplastic polyps of the large bowel in patients with a history of colorectal adenoma. The trial enrolled 2,600 patients and compared VIOXX 25 mg to placebo. The trial began enrollment in 2000.
VIOXX was launched in the United States in 1999 and has been marketed in more than 80 countries. In some countries, the product is marketed under the trademark CEOXX. Worldwide sales of VIOXX in 2003 were $2.5 billion.
Results of the VIGOR (VIOXX Gastrointestinal Outcomes Research) study, released in March 2000, demonstrated that the risk of gastrointestinal toxicity with VIOXX was less than with naproxen, but indicated an increased risk of cardiovascular events versus naproxen. However, in other studies including Merck's Phase III studies that were the basis of regulatory approval of the product, there was not an increased risk of cardiovascular events with VIOXX compared with placebo or VIOXX compared with other non-naproxen non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Merck began long-term randomized clinical trials to provide an even more comprehensive picture of the cardiovascular safety profile of VIOXX.
"Merck has always believed that prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials are the best way to evaluate the safety of medicines. APPROVe is precisely this type of study - and it has provided us with new data on the cardiovascular profile of VIOXX," said Peter S. Kim, Ph.D., president of Merck Research Laboratories. "While the cause of these results is uncertain at this time, they suggest an increased risk of confirmed cardiovascular events beginning after 18 months of continuous therapy. While we recognize that VIOXX benefited many patients, we believe this action is appropriate."
Merck has informed the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and regulatory authorities in other countries of its decision. The company also is in the process of notifying health care practitioners in the United States and other countries where VIOXX is marketed. Patients who are currently taking VIOXX should contact their health care providers to discuss discontinuing use of VIOXX and possible alternative treatments. In addition, patients and health care professionals may obtain information from www.merck.com and www.vioxx.com, or may call (888) 36-VIOXX (1-888-368-4699).
The results of clinical studies with one molecule in a given class are not necessarily applicable to others in the class. Therefore, the clinical significance of the APPROVe trial, if any, for the long-term use of other drugs in this class, consisting of COX-2 specific inhibitors and NSAIDs, is unknown. The company will work with regulatory authorities in the 47 countries where ARCOXIA is approved to assess whether changes to the prescribing information for this class of drugs, including ARCOXIA, are warranted. Merck is continuing to seek approval for ARCOXIA in other countries, including the United States.
Merck will continue its extensive clinical program to collect additional longer-term data for ARCOXIA, its medication for arthritis and acute pain.
With regard to financial guidance, prior to today's announcement, Merck remained comfortable with its 2004 earnings per share guidance of $3.11 to $3.17. The company currently expects earnings per share to be negatively affected by $0.50 to $0.60 as a result of today's announcement. This estimate includes foregone sales, writeoffs of inventory held by Merck, customer returns of product previously sold and costs to undertake the pullback of the product. Included in this cost estimate is the expectation of foregone fourth quarter sales of VIOXX of $700 million to $750 million. In addition, Merck expects that worldwide approximately one month of inventory is held by customers and will be returned.
At this point it is uncertain which of these costs will be recorded in the third quarter and which will be recorded in the fourth quarter. Therefore, at this point, Merck is retracting the third quarter guidance it had previously provided.
Merck will report third-quarter earnings on Oct. 21. At that point, the company will provide additional information regarding the costs for product withdrawal.
Merck & Co., Inc. is a global research-driven pharmaceutical company. Merck discovers, develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of innovative products to improve human and animal health, directly and through its joint ventures.
Forward Looking Statement
This press release contains "forward-looking statements" as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve risks and uncertainties, which may cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the statements. The forward-looking statements may include statements regarding product development, product potential or financial performance. No forward-looking statement can be guaranteed, and actual results may differ materially from those projected. Merck undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Forward-looking statements in this press release should be evaluated together with the many uncertainties that affect Merck's business, particularly those mentioned in the cautionary statements in Item 1 of Merck's Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2003, and in its periodic reports on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K (if any), which the company incorporates by reference.
VIOXX® (rofecoxib) is a registered trademark of Merck & Co., Inc.
23 September, 2004 11:49 AM
An article in today's the Age caught my attention today. The headline is Net profits: Your don't have to be a dotcom heavyweight to make money on the web.
Its a good article that scratches the surface of what is becoming more and more common for people wanting to make a few dollars on the side. I did a bit of an anecdotal survey a few months back on some of the top, middle and lower bloggers on the blog ecosystem and found that in all categories a significant number of bloggers have some form of income stream (or at least are attempting to have one) on their site - whether that be Ads, Affiliates, Tip Jars or directly selling products.
Of course some say that this is destroying blogging - and there are some examples of some who are selling their souls to make a few dollars - but I suspect it will become more and more common in the future. One of the things I'm toying with as an idea is to form some sort of a co-operative/network of bloggers who want to do some more commercial blogging. One of the hardest things about making a blog a viable source of income is that it can take a lot of time to build your domain's page ranking. To make it worth your time you need to be able to attract significant numbers of readers to your site and that means a high ranking of Google. This is hard to do alone but I suspect if we worked together - sharing a domain and know how it would be a lot easier.
Anyway - just thinking it all through at the moment and would be interested from hearing from anyone who was interested in the experiment.
Back to the article I quoted above - here is a taster:
'Fancy a work-from-home lifestyle or just a little spare cash on the side? The days of the dotcom bonanza are over, but dreams of making money from the internet live on.
Online riches may be just an illusion used to trap the unwary - an inventive array of get-rich-quick schemes, including the infamous Nigerian money scam, will quickly see the gullible fleeced - but for those willing to dabble in less lucrative, albeit legal, ventures, there are modest gains to be made.
Some people sign up for webpage ads, fill out surveys and join online marketing programs. Others turn their trash into treasure on eBay and put PayPal on their websites, hoping for tips and donations.'
Read more at Net profits
18 September, 2004 2:03 PM
Get all the latest news on a variety of topics at Breaking News Blog.
The Melbourne Cup 2004 results are:
1. Makybe Diva
2. Vinnie Roe
5. Hugs Dancer
11. On A Jeune
12. Media Puzzle
13. Grey Song
14. Roman Arch
16. Another Warrior
17. Winning Belle
20. Don Raphael
21. Pacific Dancer
22. Hard To Get
24. She's Archie.
The Melbourne Cup is being run at 3.10pm on Tuesday 2nd November in 2004. It's the 'race that stops the nation'. What will the results of the 2004 Melbourne Cup be?
Following is a list of Melbourne Cup information, articles, tips and llinks to help you prepare for your Melbourne cup day.
- Melbourne Cup - Official Site - 'The Melbourne Cup, it is the race that defines Australian horse racing, it's the race that stops a nation, people from all around Australia stop for the spring carnival. They engage in betting on the Australia spring carnival and it is also a huge part in the Australian racing history. Held at the Flemington race track in Melbourne and organised by the VRC the Melbourne Cup is definately a horse racing bookies dream.'
- Field for Melbourne Cup - all the horses listed with odds. Barrier draw will be added as it comes to hand.
- Melbourne Cup Jockeys - A list of the 2004 Melbourne Cup Jockeys - with their previous records.
- The Age - Horse Racing Page - with all the latest Melbourne Cup news, information on horses, jockeys, lead up races, tips etc.
- Culture and Recreation - Melbourne Cup - Australian Government page descibing the event.
- Melbourne Cup Blog - a blog with the latest Melbourne Cup news, tips, articles and gossip.
- About.com - Melbourne cup - the Countdown begins.
- Ozeform - Melbourne Cup. 'The Melbourne Cup is Australia's most famous horse race, and is truly the "race, which stops a nation".
All over Australia, millions of people tune in to watch or listen to the famous race - even proceedings in Parliament cease so that Members can hear it.
In Melbourne it is the reason for a Public Holiday and is considered the biggest tourist attraction in its home state of Victoria.
In many ways the Melbourne Cup is an anachronism - being a handicap and run over the unfashionable distance of 3200m - when in other countries the feature events are more likely to be run at weight-for-age and over 2000m to 2400m....'
- Racenet - Melbourne Cup - Melbourne Cup Stats including past winners, jockeys, horses, colors, barriers etc.